The scope was much broader.

Bottom Line Up Front: The narrative that Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes were confined to a private Caribbean island obscures the true scope of his trafficking operation. Court records, federal indictments, and victim testimony reveal a multi-jurisdictional criminal enterprise spanning at least seven locations across four countries, facilitated by Ghislaine Maxwell’s recruitment and coordination network.

What We Know by Location

Federally Prosecuted Locations

Palm Beach, Florida (2002–2005) The initial 2005 Palm Beach police investigation documented the most extensive victim count at any single location. Investigators interviewed five initial victims who described being paid for “massages” that became sexual assaults. The investigation ultimately identified more than 30 girls who had been victimized, with formal records confirming 36-40 minors assaulted at his Palm Beach mansion. A later Miami Herald investigation connected approximately 60 victims to this location alone.

Federal significance: This location formed the basis for the controversial 2008 non-prosecution agreement and subsequent federal oversight.

Manhattan, New York (2002–2005)
The 2019 federal indictment specifically details that Epstein sexually exploited “dozens” of underage girls at his East 71st Street townhouse. Court documents describe a systematic operation where victims were recruited and brought to this location, often multiple times.

Federal significance: This location was central to the 2019 federal sex trafficking charges that led to Epstein’s arrest and subsequent death in custody.

Maxwell Network Locations

Ghislaine Maxwell’s 2021 federal conviction for sex trafficking conspiracy provides crucial context for understanding how multiple locations functioned as part of a coordinated operation. Maxwell was found guilty of recruiting, grooming, and transporting minors across state lines and international borders between 1994-2004, making her complicity in the multi-location operation legally established fact.

Little Saint James, U.S. Virgin Islands (1998–2019) While victim counts are less precisely documented, multiple witnesses testified during Maxwell’s trial about assaults occurring on this 75-acre private island. The location served as both destination and psychological isolation tool within the trafficking operation.

Maxwell connection: Federal prosecutors proved Maxwell helped coordinate victim transportation to this location as part of the trafficking conspiracy.

London, England (1994-2001) Multiple victims, including Virginia Giuffre, have provided detailed accounts of being trafficked to London and assaulted at Maxwell’s residence and other locations. These allegations include encounters with high-profile individuals.

International scope: These allegations demonstrate the operation’s international reach and Maxwell’s role in facilitating overseas trafficking.

Paris, France (Various dates) Several victims have described being taken to Paris as part of the trafficking operation, with some allegations involving assaults at luxury hotels and private residences.

Additional Documented Locations

Zorro Ranch, New Mexico (1996) Maria Farmer and her sister provided detailed accounts of assaults at Epstein’s 33,000-square-foot ranch compound. These 1996 incidents represent some of the earliest documented allegations in the case timeline.

Ohio (Wexner Property, 1996) Maria Farmer also alleged assault at a property owned by Leslie Wexner, Epstein’s primary financial benefactor. This location highlights the broader network of enablers who provided Epstein access to additional properties.

Transportation Venues Multiple victims have described assaults occurring during flights on Epstein’s private aircraft, effectively making his planes mobile crime scenes that crossed multiple jurisdictions.

South Carolina & California A 2021 lawsuit detailed specific allegations: an 11-year-old victim in Hilton Head, South Carolina (1993) and another victim in Palm Springs, California (2003), expanding the geographic footprint even further.

Timeline Analysis

Rather than discrete periods, the evidence shows overlapping operations across multiple locations:

• 1993-1996: Early period with documented cases in New Mexico, Ohio, and South Carolina
• 1998-2007: Peak operational period with simultaneous activity in Palm Beach, Manhattan, and Little Saint James
• 1994-2004: Maxwell’s conspiracy period (as legally established), spanning multiple international and domestic locations
• Post-2008: Continued activity despite plea agreement, primarily at Little Saint James and Manhattan

The Maxwell Factor

Ghislaine Maxwell’s federal conviction fundamentally changes how we understand these multiple locations. She wasn’t merely present—she was the operational coordinator who:

• Recruited victims across different locations and social circles
• Transported minors between properties and across state/international lines
• Managed logistics that enabled the multi-location operation
• Maintained victim compliance through psychological manipulation and isolation

Maxwell’s guilty verdict on sex trafficking conspiracy charges means the multi-location operation is now legally established as a coordinated criminal enterprise, not isolated incidents.

Source Classification

Federal Court Records: Palm Beach (36-40 confirmed), Manhattan (“dozens”), Maxwell conspiracy (multiple locations)

Civil Litigation: New Mexico, Ohio, South Carolina, California, London, Paris allegations

Victim Compensation Program: 125+ victims have received settlements, suggesting the actual scope exceeds what’s documented in criminal proceedings

Investigative Journalism: Miami Herald investigation expanded Palm Beach victim count to ~60

Summary

The evidence demonstrates that Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes occurred across a sophisticated, Maxwell-coordinated network spanning:

• At least 7 primary locations across 4 countries
• Multiple transportation venues (private aircraft)
• 135+ settlements awarded through estate compensation program
• 20+ year operational period (1993-2019)

The “private island” narrative minimizes both the scope of victimization and the systematic nature of an operation that Maxwell helped coordinate across multiple jurisdictions. Understanding this geographic spread is crucial for grasping how trafficking operations exploit jurisdictional boundaries and the complicity required to sustain them.

---

Sources

Federal Court Documents

• U.S. Department of Justice – Jeffrey Epstein Charges
• United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Case No. 20-cr-330 (S.D.N.Y. 2021)

Major News Investigations

• Miami Herald – Perversion of Justice Investigation
• New York Times – Jeffrey Epstein Victims
• Washington Post – Epstein Sex Trafficking Charges
• BBC News Coverage

Analysis & Context

• The Cut – How Many Jeffrey Epstein Victims
• CBS 6 News – Epstein Estate Compensation
• WSB-TV Explainer

Reference

• Wikipedia – Jeffrey Epstein
• Wikipedia – Ghislaine Maxwell

Methodology & Contributions

Research Methodology

Data Collection Approach: This analysis synthesizes information from federal court documents, investigative journalism, civil litigation records, and victim compensation data to map the geographic scope of Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking network. Statistical claims regarding victim numbers are sourced from law enforcement records, federal indictments, and established media investigations.

Source Verification: Each location and victim count was cross-referenced against primary sources including Department of Justice press releases, court filings from United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Miami Herald investigative reporting, and civil lawsuit documentation. Geographic claims were verified through multiple independent sources where available.

Bias Mitigation: Source quality was distinguished between federally prosecuted cases (highest verification), Maxwell conspiracy trial evidence (legally established), and civil litigation allegations (documented but not criminally prosecuted) to provide transparent assessment of claim strength.

Human Author Contributions

• Conceptual Framework: Developed the “beyond the island” thesis to counter narrow geographic narratives about Epstein’s crimes
• Data Direction: Specified focus on multi-jurisdictional scope, timeline precision, and Maxwell’s coordinated role rather than treating locations as isolated incidents
• Source Requirements: Established need for clear distinction between federal prosecutions, Maxwell trial evidence, and civil allegations
• Critical Analysis: Identified importance of emphasizing Maxwell’s legally-established role as operational coordinator to demonstrate systematic nature of network
• Quality Control: Requested specific victim count precision (“135 settlements awarded” vs “confirmed victims”) and geographic accuracy corrections
• Visual Strategy: Requested infographic to demonstrate scope, then guided simplification when technical issues arose

AI Assistant Contributions

• Research Execution: Compiled and organized information from federal court documents, news investigations, and legal proceedings across multiple jurisdictions
• Data Synthesis: Integrated timeline information to show overlapping operations rather than discrete periods at different locations
• Content Organization: Structured findings to distinguish between different levels of legal verification (federal prosecution vs civil litigation)
• Visual Development: Created interactive infographic and WordPress-compatible version to enhance data accessibility
• Source Documentation: Compiled comprehensive citation list with direct links to primary sources
• Methodology Documentation: Created transparent accounting of research process and respective contributions